An advantage of open source software is how quickly it can be up and running. Enterprises can in a matter of days use versions of the software created by online communities and start getting work done. While experimenting with versions created by online communities’ enterprises can discover which one solves their business problems. Once an enterprise discovers the software that meets all its requirements it can adopt it. After adopting it, an enterprise can take advantage of the professional support and services that accompany it. 74% of organizations are afraid of the unknown quality of components used in Open Source Software.
(And encourage them to contribute!) What if a developer wants to contribute code from one open source project to the one you are working on but the two projects have different licenses? How can your contributions to open source serve a virtuous cycle, so that your projects benefit from contributions in turn? In the 1950s and 1960s researchers developing early internet technologies and telecommunication network protocols relied on an open and collaborative research environment. The Advanced Research Projects Agency Network , which would later become the foundation for the modern internet, encouraged peer review and an open feedback process. Forums helped facilitate conversation and develop standards for open communication http://www.djournal.com/beaxy-taps-blockdaemon-for-node-infrastructure/article_1f4ae683-dc9e-5b18-b4fd-b63022e2c415.html and collaboration. By the time of the birth of the internet in the early 1990s, the values of collaboration, peer review, communication, and openness were written into its foundations. A key enabler to this movement has been the more modern software licenses that companies have either originally embraced or migrated to over time. Mongo’s new license, as well as those of Elastic and Cockroach are good examples of these. Unlike the Apache incubated license – which was often the starting point for open-source projects a decade ago, these licenses are far more business-friendly and most model open-source businesses are adopting them. Economic benefits, endless innovations, newfound freedom, and hundreds of more advantages!
Additionally, the availability of an open-source implementation of a standard can increase adoption of that standard. It has also helped to build developer loyalty as developers feel empowered and have a sense of ownership of the end product. In the early days of computing, programmers and developers shared software in order to learn from each other and evolve the field of computing. Eventually, the open-source notion moved to the wayside of commercialization of software in the years 1970–1980. For example, Donald Knuth in 1979 with the TeX typesetting system or Richard Stallman in 1983 with the GNU operating system. In 1997, Eric Raymond published The Cathedral and the Bazaar, a reflective analysis of the hacker community and free-software principles. The paper received significant attention in early 1998, and was one factor in motivating Netscape Communications Corporation to release their popular Netscape Communicator Internet suite as free software. This source code subsequently became the basis behind SeaMonkey, Mozilla Firefox, Thunderbird and KompoZer. Particularly important to multiplatform software such as ACE is the diversity of computing platforms that are tested simultaneously by the user community. In addition to the multiplication of test cases and scenarios mentioned above, the open-source nature of ACE leverages an enormous combination of hardware platforms, operating system versions, and compiler releases.
In many cases, for instance, testers in the ACE user community are also excellent software application developers. These tester/developers can use their considerable debugging skills when they encounter occasional problems with the ACE open-source software base. The open-source model makes it possible to employ the talents of these gifted developers, who would rarely be satisfied with playing the role of a tester in traditional software organizations. In many open-source projects, such as ACE, the names of users who contribute fixes, ideas, and features are recorded in ChangeLog and THANKS files. Prolific contributors therefore achieve a level of international recognition in the community, which itself can be highly rewarding.
An open system can face a lot of user-related problems. The first major problem is that anyone can edit or add contents. This can be dangerous if the added content is not legal and also if it is copyrighted. Since the user cannot be tracked, the site has to take the responsibility for such acts.
IT managers in organizations face constant frustration when dealing with vendor lock-ins’. Lack of portability, expensive license fees and inability to customize software are some of the other disadvantages. Using open source software gives you more freedom and you can effectively address all these disadvantages. The term “open source” was originally intended to be trademarkable; however, the term was deemed too descriptive, so no trademark exists. The OSI would prefer that people treat importance of open source software open source as if it were a trademark, and use it only to describe software licensed under an OSI approved license. Open Source for America is a group created to raise awareness in the United States Federal Government about the benefits of open-source software. Their stated goals are to encourage the government’s use of open source software, participation in open-source software projects, and incorporation of open-source community dynamics to increase government transparency.
Even if they can’t provide immediate fixes, they can often provide concise test cases that allow the core ACE developers to isolate and resolve problems quickly. In contrast, software debugging and QA productivity can scale up as the number of developers helping to debug the software increases. This is particularly true in open-source development projects, where the user community engages in very large scale http://www.merrilledge.com/research/story?strykey=2508-202109071037pr_news_uspr_____ph94028-1 distributed testing. For example, ACE’s users are autonomous and therefore don’t need the level of coordination and communication that a conventional development team requires. Although ACE has an extensive set of regression tests, its large user community brings many other privately developed applications to bear on each new release, effectively multiplying the regression test suite many times over.